But the one-inch group at 75 feet was my lofty goal and one not easily met by man or machine. I could have cheated and dropped the requirement to three shots in one inch but then I would not have had a standard by which to compare results I began compiling in the late 1970s. No, five shots in one inch at 25 yards was the goal. Along the way I have come heartbreakingly close. I have fired the occasional one-inch group but true constituency and accuracy on demand have eluded me. One reason that the goal was so difficult was that I also demanded reliability. I simply was not willing to sacrifice reliability. I had seen too many too tight 1911 handguns hang up on the range and seen extractors give out in some of these pistols as well. My one-inch pistol would also be a reliable handgun. The 1911 is among the most reliable handguns ever designed as well as the most robust. Once I had my pistol set up properly I could expect the piece to last for many thousands of rounds. The pistol would be one for a shooter who practices and fires thousands of rounds in the course of a year’s time.
Next I considered the barrel. The barrel would be a Bar Sto Precision Machine match-grade, gunsmith-fit barrel. Long experience and excellent results in any number of 1911 handguns gave me little choice. Bar Sto it would be. I considered other criteria and dismissed the full length guide rod. There are genuine advantages of the FLGR as well as drawbacks. I like removing the slide, guide rod and spring intact and also like the rigid fit of the FLGR in most cases. But for ease of maintenance the FLGR world be deleted. I foresaw firing lots of ammunition and cleaning the piece frequently.
When completed, the pistol was not the overly tight type you sometimes see. The pistol is very smooth, with the Bar Sto barrel and bushing offering a good tight fit. The slide and frame move together smoothly but the three-point pedestal fit of the barrel, hood and locking lugs is just right. As for feed reliability, the gap between the two parts of the feed ramp, the barrel and frame portion, are perfectly set at 1/32 inch. After some time with tactical pistols, I did not include a magazine guide into the design of my pistol. I elected to use Wilson Combat ETM magazines for service use. The less variables to consider, the better.
The first test group was fired with the Black Hills 200-grain SWC. The average of the first three groups was 1.25 inches. I settled down, rubbed my wrists, and fired a string with the CorBon Performance Match 230-grain ball loading. I was rewarded with a 1.2 inch standard. I also had on hand the FBI service load, Winchester’s 230-grain Bonded Core. This one went into 1.8 inches, excellent for a full power service load. The thought struck me that perhaps the pistol would be superbly accurate with anything! Not so! I loaded the piece with Wolf 230-grain ball, a reliable and affordable practice load. While 3.5 inches isn’t bad with this load, this is not tack-driving accuracy. One of my bulk loads using the Oregon Trail 230-grain RNL bullet with enough WW231 for 790 fps fell into a 2.25-inch groupvery nice for an economical high production practice load.| Accuracy results | |
| Handloads | 25 yd. group |
| Oregon Trail 200-gr. SWC, 4.5 Bullseye, 840 fps | .9 |
| Oregon Trail 200-gr. SWC, 5.5 WW 231, 866 fps | 1.0 |
| Sierra 200-gr., JFP, 5.0 Titegroup, 853 fps | 1.0 |
| Nosler 185-gr. JHP, 8.2 WSF, 1,020 fps | .95 |
| Factory loads | 25 yd. group |
| Cor Bon Performance Match 230-gr. | 1.2 |
| Cor Bon 230-grain +P | 1.9 |
| Black Hills 200-gr. SWC | 1.25 |
| Black Hills 230-gr. JHP | 1.75 |
| Winchester 230-gr. Bonded Core | 1.8 |
| Winchester 230-gr. SXT | 1.75 |